Māori ward

Council agreed at its meeting of 3 November 2011 to start the process to create a Māori ward in time for the next local body election in 2013.

Have your say

Council welcomes comments about the information on this page. Read to the bottom to have your say.

The latest news

15 December 2011

Legal advice on Māori ward supports move

The Nelson City Council’s move to create a Māori ward in time for the next local body election did not breach legislation, according to an independent legal opinion received by Council at its final meeting of the year today.

A local resident who is also a lawyer recently questioned the legality of the resolution to establish a Māori ward passed by Council on 3 November. He claimed it breached both the Local Electoral Act 2001 and the Local Government Act 2002.

Council then asked for an independent opinion, which was the basis of the extensive report presented by Nelson lawyer Camilla Owen today. It says Council was correct in believing it did not have a legal obligation to consult on the decision and that a poll whether to proceed with the move could be initiated by either the public, or Council.

Since the public advertising of the Council resolution a Nelson resident has launched a petition to hold a poll on whether to create a Māori ward. The petition has a threshold of 5% (1701) of Nelson electors to initiate a binding poll. The deadline for the completion of the petition is 28 February 2012.

Nelson Mayor Aldo Miccio says the poll is one way of hearing what the public has to say on what is an important issue. “The public will have its say through a poll, and we will listen.”

“This was always going to be a contentious issue. The petition and poll are critical safeguards.”

Maori Ward legal opinion to be discussed week of 12 Dec

Council is to discuss a legal opinion regarding the creation of a Maori ward in the public session of its next meeting.

A Nelson resident raised issues of the legality of the move in the public forum section of a recent meeting and Council subsequently committed to seek independent legal advice. The resident, a lawyer, said at the meeting that he thought Council breached the Local Electoral Act 2001 and the Local Government Act 2002.

The independent legal advice has now been received and will be discussed at the final Council meeting of the year on Thursday 15 December at 9am in the Council Chamber. Copies of the legal opinion are included in the Public Agenda. 

Nelson Mayor Aldo Miccio says Council is keen to be transparent about the issue and reminds residents that Council meetings are open to the public to attend.

8 November 2011

The Human Rights Commission commends Nelson City Councillors' move to create a Maori ward.

4 November 2011

Nelson City Council will be the first unitary Council in the country to have a Māori ward. Currently the Bay of Plenty Regional Council has four Māori seats and the Waikato Regional Council has voted to establish two.

The number of seats on Council (12 plus the Mayor) would not change, but one seat would be specifically to represent a Māori ward within Nelson city.

Council must publicly notify its intention to create the Māori ward no later than the 23rd of November to ensure it can be adopted in time for the 2013 election.

Council’s submission to the Local Government Commission on the issue of amalgamation with Tasman District recommended the creation of a Māori ward and Community Board if amalgamation goes ahead.

The move is to ensure the process is underway to have a Māori ward within Nelson city in case amalgamation does not proceed.

Why move now, and why it is important

Nelson City Councillors have consistently shown their cultural insight and historical understanding of why Māori representation at a governance level is a positive move. They have also demonstrated they understand the practical implications and (arguably) the benefits of having a Māori presence at the governance level.

  • It allows Māori input into decisions at a governance level
  • It allows for cultural values to inform decision making
  • It provides a positive environment for partnership in a post settlement environment
  • Māori, like councils, always have been and will continue to be, part of our community.

According to legislative requirements, Council was able to make this decision on behalf of the community without consultation. (Read more about the legislation below.)

In addition, the recommendation Council publicly made in its submission to the Local Government Commission strongly advocated for this position.  Local iwi and Mata Waka representatives have also made many submissions in recent years requesting such a ward be established. 

Looking at this from a practical viewpoint, the needs of the Council to govern our city requires access to a Treaty of Waitangi partner/Māori point of view to help Councillors make informed decisions on behalf of all the citizens of Nelson. Council is aware that although the Crown is the Treaty partner, an increasing part of the implementation of Treaty settlement falls to mana whenua iwi and local councils.

Iwi leaders are on record as strongly supporting better representation of Māori around the Council table for the best interests of the city and to give Māori a more effective voice in decision making.

Further, the decision would give better effect to the Local Government Act requirement to provide opportunities for Māori to be involved in its decision making processes.

Is the representation proportional?

In the Nelson electorate the proportional number of Māori seats comes out at 0.78*.  In accordance with Schedule 1A of the Local Electoral Act 2001, any portion greater than 0.5 is rounded up to 1.  The calculation therefore supports the establishment of one Māori ward in Nelson City.

So what does that mean for voting?

The process for election is as follows:

Under S.24B of the Local Electoral Act, 2001, a person who is an elector of a Maori ward is at the triennial election entitled to vote:

  • at the election of the Mayor; and
  • at the election of the member or members who will represent that Maori ward; and
  • at the election of the member or members to be elected to represent the whole of the district.

An elector in a Māori ward does not forgo their right to vote for the Mayor and other councillors to be elected.  

*This figure has been corrected from an original report stating the ratio was .58, which was subsequently noted as an error.

Legislation information

The law requires Council to give public notice no later than 30 November 2011 (i.e. within 7 days of the Council resolution under section 19ZA (1) of the Act.)  The public notice must include:

(a)    notice of the resolution under section 19Z; and

(b)    a statement that a poll is required to countermand (overturn) that resolution.

This may trigger a poll of electors, the process of which is also prescribed in the Act. 

Finally, the territorial authority(Council) may resolve to hold a poll under section 19ZD of the Local Electoral Act 2001 under the same timeline in the Act.

Read more about the legislation that applies to this decision.

Local Government Act 2002

Electoral Act

Māori wards and constituencies

Go here for more information on Māori wards and constituencies. (scroll down to the bottom of the page)

Post your comment

Please answer this question:

What is 11 + 9?

Show another question

Comments

  • I support the establishment of a Maori Ward seat on the NCC.

    Posted by Cynthia McConville, 16/12/2011 12:54pm (2 months ago)

  • It's a brilliant idea, about time! Shame it's brought the rednecks out in force though. Congratulations for doing the right thing

    Posted by Marianne Wilkinson, 14/12/2011 8:06pm (2 months ago)

  • Kia ora koutou
    As I am new to this area but have been following the debate, however missed informed, with some interest.
    It seems some of the good citizens of Nelson are making some very interesting claims regarding Maori Wards, they are undemocratic, they are racist, they give special preference to Maori, Maori should get off their butts and get elected same as anyone else. What is equally obvious is that anyone with a differing point of view has not even given anything like a fair hearing.
    Of interest is that we have a Judge, a Bishop and the Human Rights commission telling us that this is a just and right thing to do. Also of interest is that the Judge’s decision in the Bay of Plenty decision did put some focus on process.
    We are just coming on of the back of a Rugby World Cup where, as it should be, New Zealand’s identity and pride in that identity was evidenced in our opening ceremonies etc. If you go to all the research before and after the RWC you will see a cultural Maori experience rated in the top three positive experiences for visitors. Whether we like it or not a large part of New Zealand’s international identity is Maori. Unfortunately to an uninformed small group of New Zealanders this does not add up to equity at of governance or representation. I hope the extreme tokenism of this does escape anyone.
    Let us deal with undemocratic issue; surely this is a first past the post versus proportional representation issue. The majority always wins the right to represent in first past the post. Nelson has had a Council in some form or another since 1876 (again the dates may be slightly wrong) and in that time they have had two Maori Councillors.
    So obviously our current Local body electoral system obviously ensures we get representation from all the community….not. Equally obvious is that a Maori point of view at the governance table is something to be feared as they may use their one vote to take over the City….. not.
    The next question is why they should get special seat; guess what citizens of Aotearoa / New Zealand there are only two Treaty partners; Maori and everyone else. Relevance of the Treaty in today’s society; it can no longer be sidelined as a “legal nullity” (Judge Prendergast, Taranaki land confiscations, 1867). Consideration of The Treaty is now part of every governance structure.
    What is pleasing is that a number of contributors to these sites have acknowledged the historic injustices even if they have struggled to see the relevance of the in today’s society. Another guess what; if you take way a peoples economic base, marginalise their input into decision making and do it over a 170 years they do feel a bit of a grievance. I know surprising isn’t it? Lesson number 2031: learn your New Zealand history first before you open your mouth.
    What Maori want, again nice to see that parental approach, “this is good for Maori because we say it is”. Another strong theme running through these sites is we are all equal, well another guess what people: if you have been consistently been at the wrong end of the social measures (health, justice and education) then obviously the system is not working for a significant portion of the population. So we are all equal just some are more equal than others.
    And finally what is really interesting is what Maori want is equity of citizenship not to take over the world but just to be included in the decisions made by our community for our community. Maori have been very humble about this issue and allowed a lot of ignorance to go unchallenged but enough is enough.

    Posted by Anon, 07/12/2011 9:10am (3 months ago)

  • THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE NOT FROM NICHOLA ROMNEY.

    Posted by NCC, 25/11/2011 5:21pm (3 months ago)

  • I am delighted that the council is taking such a positive and collaborative approach.
    I am pakeha and I believe that local iwi have an enormous amount to contribute to the region and I am delighted to see Nelson leading the way in this area.

    Maori wisdom has so much to offer our country and when this is fully understood I think many people will feel sheepish for having such a fear based reaction.

    Collaboration and a respect for each others strengths and contribution will make New Zealand and Nelson unique in the world and I am
    very proud of the council and its role in initiating a constructive collaborative process.

    Posted by Nickola, 25/11/2011 5:09pm (3 months ago)

  • I would appreciate this comment being passed onto Cr Barker.

    Cr Barker displayed leadership and commonsense in his comments today relating to the set up of the Maori Ward. I and a number of others in the community strongly support Cr Barkers view, that the Resolution to set up a Maori Ward, be rescinded. Judging from the recent information put into the public arena, it is quite apparent that the vote obtained by Councillors to proceed with the resolution was 'corrupt'.
    Cr Barker also voiced his views that separate Maori representation was against Democracy, a strong view which is held by a large number of New Zealanders.
    I have spoken with a number of people, along with a Strategic Policy Analyst from a Council in the BOP. A statement was made to me (in writing), that there is cause here for a worthwhile challenge to be taken up against the set- up of Maori Wards, by a local authority.

    This issue of Maori Wards is highly controversial, and their needs to be an opportunity for ALL New Zealanders to vote on this immensely important legislative 'request' to Councils
    That is OUR right under democracy.

    Posted by Nikki Romney, 22/11/2011 9:47pm (3 months ago)

  • I believe the submission for a Maori Ward should be withdrawn. It's apparent that pressure was placed on the Councillors in making this decision, which then presents a case of 'duress' in obtaining the unanimous vote. Then we can stop the petition, and save the headache of a poll and costs to the ratepayer of over $90,000. It can be looked at again in the future, with an appropriate process followed next time. Then you could better spend your time in sorting out your internal conflicts and leadership roles. Anyway, that's my opinion, not that I know much about Council matters. I thought Reese's advice - 'getting back to basics' was smart.

    Posted by Nikki Romney, 21/11/2011 2:38pm (3 months ago)

  • Under no circumstances should the Council even consider a Maori ward, this is apartheid

    Posted by Murray Wootton, 21/11/2011 1:02pm (3 months ago)

  • I am disadvantaged too - white, middle class, middle aged....

    Posted by Tim, 19/11/2011 6:22pm (3 months ago)

  • Oh I forgot fundamentalist Christians. Nelson has large groups of : Bretheren, Church of Christ, Pentecostals and others. What about their special right to impose their archaic beliefs on Council?. I personally regard the fetishatistic (made that up) veneration of tribal Maori culture just as irrelevant as the old testament is. But try saying this in New Zealand and you will be shouted down with 'Racist' Same tactics of intimidation which the New Right used in the US to frighten their critics. But in NZ it is the doctrine of 'noble' exceptional Maori culture. Same as the Christians really - archaic dogma and the shutting down of free discussion because it might offend or hurt the feelings of someone. Well done Nikki Romney - ignore your critics and go ahead and be offensive!

    Posted by Dangeroustospeakout, 19/11/2011 4:25pm (3 months ago)

1 2 3 next »

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments